Archive for November, 2012

“Would You Knowingly Condemn Your Children To Slavery?”

And a new Youtube Video
By Ron Ewart, President
National Association of Rural Landowners
and nationally recognized author on freedom and property rights issues.
We are helping to spread freedom and liberty around the globe.
© Copyright Wednesday, November 28, 2012 – All Rights Reserved
Would You …?” Youtube Video at:
Would you see your children
Condemned to slavery
When there was a chance
You could save them?
Would you deny them victory?
Would you deny your family freedom?
You cannot fight an enemy if you cannot see him.  You have no defense if you are surrounded in darkness but your enemy controls the light.  You have no options if you cannot pierce the veil of your enemy’s deceit.  There is absolutely no defense if you cloak yourself in ignorance, or convince yourself that the enemy is not there.  But rest assured, the enemy is lurking just outside your door and your door will not protect you or your children from him coming inside and destroying your blind tranquility that you thought was freedom.   The American government is now all-powerful.  They own the law and the capability to enforce it, by whatever means and they are determined to do it.
That enemy is knocking on your door right now but you don’t know it, or choose to ignore it.  And if you don’t open it, the enemy will break the door down and come in anyway.  They will take your children away and put them in government-run indoctrination and propaganda schools.  But wait a minute! They have already taken your children away and are now indoctrinating them in government-run indoctrination and propaganda schools, or didn’t you know that?  The difference is you have willingly given your children to the state and are exposing them to that indoctrination and propaganda without so much as a whimper in opposition.
Would you be a slave
In your own land
When once you were free?
Would you bow down
To tyrants like Obama
Rather than defending liberty?
Many years ago, as we entered the 20th Century, we were a different stock of people.  We were defiant in our freedom and we rejected or purged what we considered infringements on that freedom.  We didn’t let important things slide or look the other way like we do now.  The truth is, had government instituted all the laws and restrictions it has now placed on the people of America, but they had done it 100 years ago, there would have been a revolution that would have made the American Revolution and the Civil War pale in comparison. 
In the late 1700’s the government instituted a whiskey tax, which erupted into the Whiskey Rebellion where many tax collectors were either killed or tarred and feathered.  In those days, violence against government agents and sympathizers was quite common when the people thought their freedoms were under attack.   Throughout the years of taming the West, frontier justice was applied regularly.  Scores and injustices were settled with weapons, not words, or courts.

Would you hide in the shadows

When your duty was quite clear?

Would you shrink from the battle

Because you are paralyzed with fear?

Now, the people have allowed government to become so powerful, the people fear it’s wrath.  We have let frontier justice, wherein we did not fear government, morph into absolute power by government in a police state where we are deathly afraid of government.   People are hesitant to raise their heads above the noise level for fear it could be chopped off, figuratively speaking of course.  Our lives are comfortable and we are very reticent about upsetting our precarious apple cart.  But those who fall afoul of the law through no fault of their own cannot escape the long hand of government by hiding in the shadows.  They become sacrificial lambs to government’s power and those in close proximity to the victim scurry for cover, saying to themselves “….. thank God it wasn’t me“.  This is equivalent to running from the battlefield while the real heroes hold the enemy at bay, or advance upon the enemy.

Is it true you are just a coward

And afraid to be free?

Do you tremble in the darkness

While on your bended knee?

Are we so afraid to defend our freedoms that we will wait until the jack booted thugs break down our door and take us and our children away because we violated some law in a million laws of which we had no knowledge?  Do we fear authority so much that we now won’t question any authority?  Are we not of the same lineage of those that gave their lives to preserve our freedom for the last 236 years?  Does not the blood of patriots run through our veins?  Or, has our collective American blood turned to jelly?  We don’t think so!

Will you instead gather up your bravery

And join the fearless in our midst?

Will you save America from slavery

While shaking a determined fist?

Will you use the intellect God gave you,

And apply it to the fight?

Will you heed the haunting cry

To set our country right?
Ladies and gentlemen, we don’t have to resort to frontier justice “…. to set our country right.”  The tools to win were handed down to us from our Founding Fathers in the form of a Constitution that took our natural, God-given, individual rights and codified them into the law of man.  All we need is the courage to fearlessly proceed under those essential tools of freedom and restore the vision of those great men for our time and our children and grandchildren’s time, unless we cower in fear, or refuse to challenge authority because of that fear.  In a Constitutional Republic, the people have the power but only if they choose to exercise that power.


The other night, as we bed down, 6 lines of a poem literally popped into our mind and we got up and wrote them down.  The next day we finished the poem, lines of which we have inserted in this article.  The entire poem is entitled: Would You …..?.  In the hopes that this poem would provide inspiration to those who are on the fence about defending freedom for their children and grandchildren, we set the poem to music and a video of images of freedom and slavery and uploaded the video to Youtube.  The last stanza of the poem goes like this:

So we ask each freedom-loving American,

Will you settle for chains and slavery

Or will you get up off your can,

And engage in the fight for liberty?

The question is: “Would You …..?”, or “Will You …..?”.  If you don’t, you may very likely condemn your children and grandchildren to slavery.


NOTE:  Feel free to forward this e-mail to others you know, if you deem it appropraite.   If you have received this message for the first time, or you have decided you no longer want to receive “The Parallax Prophecies” column, simply insert REMOVE in the subject line and return the e-mail to us.  Your e-mail address will be removed immediately.

To Publishers:  You have our permission to re-print this article (or excerpts therefrom), provided we are given credit as the author and our website (www.narlo.org) appears with the article, or the excerpt.  It is not necessary to include the “Parallax” banner with the article.
Ron Ewart, President
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RURAL LANDOWNERS
P. O. Box 1031, Issaquah, WA  98027
425 837-5365 or 1 800 682-7848

1 Comment

The Socialist States of America.

The Times 11/17/2012, Page A06

Obama has empty promises

Sometime around midnight on Nov. 6, our great country ceased to be the United States of Amer­ica.

We officially gave up the right to that term, which signified freedom for the inhabitants of the piece of the continent known as North America. While not of­ficially renamed as yet, we will no doubt become known as The Socialist States of America.

If you are still in denial that this will take place, please mark it down somewhere that this will indeed become a fact within a few short months. There should be no doubt in anyone with a brain as large as an English pea, that Obama has intended from the very outset of his po­litical career to radically trans­form this country into some­thing closely akin to those coun­tries where his radical brothers now exist.

I hate to think of the blood­shed that we will witness in this country when these changes be­gin to take place. Those who fell into “lock-step” with this radi­cal, socialist ideology, as he de­ceived them with empty prom­ises and from whom he hid his true agenda, will turn on him, but by then it will do them no good.

Germany did the same thing with a man by the name of Hitler, and those with half a brain can tell you what took place in that once proud country.

Just a few short days removed from the election, we have al­ready been informed that tax­es are going to increase to pre­vent us from plunging over the “fiscal cliff.” We were warned over and over about Obama’s re­marks to Russia that “after the election, I will have more flex­ibility” and now we are about to see what was meant by that statement, to which the liberals paid absolutely no attention.

I could go on and on about the empty promises this man has made over the past five years, but I am sure that, if you have read this far, you are very famil­iar with the lies he has told and the various ways he has skirted the Constitution in order to work his ultimate agenda of bring­ing down our great country. I shudder to think of the radi­cal changes we will see over the next four years since Obama cannot legally seek a third term (even though, he may still at­tempt to make himself the per­manent ruler or our country).

If you think this is outrageous, then ask yourself how much of what has transpired in the last four years would you have be­lieved to be possible in a demo­cratic society. Folks, let’s face it — we put the fox in charge of the chicken house; he ate all the chickens; gave the ducks all the “freebies” they wanted, and now he is coming for the sheep.

John Billingsley Sr. lives in Benton.

John Billingsley

Guest Columnist

Powered by TECNAVIA
Copyright 2012, The Times. Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy/Your California Privacy Rights, updated March 13, 2007.

Leave a comment

Is Obama hiding the truth about Benghazi because the truth would impeach him?

| (7) Comments | Subscribe | Back to full Article | Contact Us

 By Judi McLeod  Thursday, November 15, 2012 Nixon, Obama, impeach, CFP Photoshop by Brian ThompsonEven with his own reelection soundly in the bag, President Barack Obama is keeping the truth about the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi as secret as his own locked-from-public-knowledge credentials.

With four more years in his pocket to complete his destructive Fundamental Transformation of America, Obama is refusing outright to inform Americans why calls for help from American Libyan Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans to save their lives were ignored until their own violent deaths silenced them.

This was Obama’s non-answer to Fox News reporter Ed Henry’s simple question at the White House yesterday:

“I wanted to ask about the families of these four Americans who were killed. Sean Smith’s father Ray said he believes his son basically called 911 for help and they didn’t get it. And I know you said you grieve for these four Americans, that it is being investigated, but the families have been waiting for more than two months. So I would like for you to address the families, if you can. On 9/11, as Commander-in-Chief, did you issue any orders to try to protect their lives?”

“Ed, I’ll address the families not through the press. I’ll address the families directly, as I already have,” Obama replied. “And we will provide all the information that is available about what happened on that day. That’s what the investigation is for.”

“Without providing a yes or no answer, the president went after his critics who question whether the U.S. government did everything it could to save the Americans under attack in Benghazi. (Fox News, Nov. 14, 2012).

“If people don’t think that we did everything we can to make sure that we saved the lives of folks who I sent there, and who were carrying out missions on behalf of the United States, then you don’t know how our Defense Department thinks or our State Department thinks or our CIA thinks,” Obama said. “Their number one priority is obviously to protect American lives.”

“As Henry raised his hand to follow up, Obama interrupted him and continued with his answer.

“I can can tell you that immediately upon finding out that our folks were in danger, that my orders to my national security team were do whatever we need to do to make sure they’re safe. And that’s the same order I would give any time that I see Americans are in danger — whether they’re civilian or military — because that’s our number one priority.”

But even in the outrageous coverup and the smokescreen set up to shroud it, the truth of Benghazi can be seen through the shadows.

As 50% of the American voting population were recoiling in bitter disappointment with the news of Obama’s reelection on Nov. 6, a soap opera-like smokescreen had already been been put in place to cover up a coming post-election Benghazi investigation.  While the Obama Election Team was gleefully counting up votes, the investigation was heading down a tawdry road cheapened by a sex scandal ruining the careers of America’s Obama’s appointed CIA director and the US Commander of Forces in Afghanistan.

During the presidential election campaign, Benghazi had gone buxom bosom with a media feeding frenzy chasing down soap opera players that include Petraeus ‘spy’ mistress Paula Broadwell and Tampa self-made socialite Jill Kelley.

Giddy with the sex angle that jumps down bosoms, the mainstream media won’t be back from play anytime soon.

Former CIA Director David Petraeus, who has already blamed Benghazi on an obscure YouTube in September 13 testimony before a Congressional Hearing,  and who has agreed to testify before a House Committee again on Friday, was already under FBI investigation for his alleged affair with Broadwell when he testified back in September.

Susan Rice, erroneously identified by Obama yesterday as UN Ambassador rather than U.S. Ambassador to the UN (Mark Levin) had been sent pre-presidential election to five television networks to spread the disinformation that a YouTube was to blame for the death of Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans—a message approved even yesterday by Obama.

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Defence Secretary Leon Panetta were dispatched to Australia for an “annual” Security Summit in Australia.

That leaves only Petraeus, whose testimony is not likely to change on Friday and whose character remains in tatters, as the left man standing.

Barack Hussein Obama, who now has four years as an executive order-wielding dictator, has no reason not to tell the truth to the loved ones of the slain Americans in Benghazi and to America at large, other than this one: the truth would impeach him.

Author

Judi McLeod  Bio

Judi McLeod Most recent columnsCopyright © Canada Free Press

RSS Feed for Judi McLeod

Judi McLeod is an award-winning journalist with 30 years’ experience in the print media. A former Toronto Sun columnist, she also worked for the Kingston Whig Standard. Her work has appeared on Rush Limbaugh, Newsmax.com, Drudge Report, Foxnews.com, and Glenn Beck.

Judi can be emailed at: judi@canadafreepress.com

Older articles by Judi McLeod

Leave a comment